From
a tender age, I asked my mother questions about life. My grandmother
was not spared my incessant questions. She used to complain that I am
the type who asked questions till she had no answers left. At that time,
I took it to mean that I should stop bothering her. It also made me
wonder why they did not share the same curiosity. It did not squelch my desire to seek for answers, however.
In my
early teens, I challenged my mother with more questions in spiritual
matters. I then decided to try out a different faith from hers. At that
time, it was a cardinal sin to question, let alone embrace another
faith. I received the strongest punishment. I think she must have found
me one tough kid to handle. I could see then that the punishment was
motivated by fear. She feared I was too young to think for myself. Or that I was influenced by my friends and that she would lose control of me. Very often, teen years are years of
experimentation and decisions made could be temporary only. I
suppose it is also very natural for parents to assume that their children
should follow in their footsteps.
Later,
I continued to explore different spiritual paths. I have met religious
teachers from different faiths. To me, spirituality is inclusive and not
divisive. Spirituality teaches us to accept one another, not punish, alienate or judge another who chooses differently from us. Does proving
that my path is better than yours make me a better person than you? And
how does one prove that? Will winning this intellectual debate mean that
I have experienced more personal transformation and added on to the
peace of this planet?
Is it man and his ego who works to separate and to have the "one-upmanship"? Mine is better and purer than yours. Mine is the real path. Is that not ironic when the goal of many religious practices is to encourage the letting go of the ego? Loosen our clinging to I, me and mine? Sometimes, it is not the religion per se but the wrong view of its practitioners. I think, what is really important is the right view and whether there has been any real transformation for the better.
Is it man and his ego who works to separate and to have the "one-upmanship"? Mine is better and purer than yours. Mine is the real path. Is that not ironic when the goal of many religious practices is to encourage the letting go of the ego? Loosen our clinging to I, me and mine? Sometimes, it is not the religion per se but the wrong view of its practitioners. I think, what is really important is the right view and whether there has been any real transformation for the better.
We have different minds and so we
are inclined and drawn to different paths. Everyone has their own time.
However, this does not change the fact that in our hearts, we are
seekers of the truth. If not, at least we seek to be better people
through our spiritual paths. Why be dogmatic? Have we considered that people who are free
thinkers maybe more spiritual than "religious" people? Are we
enlightened people? Who are we to judge? And who says we know better?
CF,
ReplyDeletesorry, I found it "very deep", no offence intended,
may be bcos I may fall under yr definition of free thinkers, but actually well written piece of thoughts
rgds, kokpiew
Dear Kok Piew,
DeleteThank you and appreciate your feedback. What I am saying, in short is let's learn to be more open minded, accepting of one another and focus less on our differences.
CF